ABSTRACT
Resumen El análisis de tres personajes correspondientes a espacios y tiempos diferentes muestra el estrecho vínculo entre la literatura y la historia de la medicina. Por un lado, don Quijote de la Mancha, quien refleja el pensamiento de los últimos años del Renacimiento y ha sido asimilado en el México contemporáneo. Por otro lado, los doctores Miguel Francisco Jiménez y Rita Levi Montalcini, quienes vivieron en los siglos XIX y XX, respectivamente. A pesar de los años que separan a los tres personaje, se advierten numerosos elementos en común que no pierden vigencia: el valor que se otorga a la salud, la ética, la tenacidad y la experiencia para obtener resultados exitosos, entre otros. Los tres personajes aluden a la medicina de su tiempo, los logros alcanzados y la promoción del humanismo, siempre inherente a la medicina.
Abstract The analysis of three characters corresponding to different spaces and times shows the close link between literature and the history of medicine. On one hand, Don Quixote of La Mancha, who reflects the thought of the last years of the Renaissance and that has been assimilated in contemporary Mexico. On the other hand, Doctors Miguel Francisco Jiménez and Rita Levi Montalcini who lived in the 19th and 20th centuries, respectively. Despite the years that separate these three personalities, many elements in common are observed that do not lose their validity: the value that is given to health, ethics, tenacity and experience to attain successful results. All three characters refer to the medicine of their time, their achievements and the promotion of humanism, always inherent to medicine.
Subject(s)
Humans , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Medicine in Literature/history , Nobel Prize , Nerve Growth Factor/history , Italy , MexicoABSTRACT
Por ocasião do sexagésimo aniversário da atribuição, em 1949, do prêmio Nobel da Medicina ou Fisiologia a Egas Moniz e a Walter Rudolf Hess, foram evocadas as circunstâncias que explicam a singular nobelização. Chama-se atenção para os traços biográficos de Egas Moniz, que são também os de muitos médicos da sua geração, asssim como dos pormenores que se prendem com o processo de nomeação e avaliação científica visando à candidatura ao prêmio Nobel. São também discutidos aspectos de ligação entre a cultura e a ciência, designadamente as controvérsias à volta do prêmio que lhe foi atribuído.
On the occasion of the sixtieth anniversary of the award in 1949, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine granted to Egas Moniz and Walter Rudolf Hess, the circumstances that explain the unique Nobel award require elucidation. Attention is drawn to the biographical traits of Egas Moniz, which are also those of many doctors of his generation, as well as the details which relate to the process of nomination and scientific appraisal to be eligible for the Nobel Prize. Aspects of the link between culture and science are also discussed, including the controversies surrounding the award conferred upon him.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Physicians/history , History of Medicine , Psychosurgery , Science/history , Cerebral Angiography , Culture , Nobel PrizeABSTRACT
Em 1978, nasceu Louise Brown, o primeiro bebê de proveta. Este nascimento histórico foi o resultado de pesquisas do biólogo Robert Edwards e do ginecologista Patrick Steptoe (1). Em 2010, Edwards recebeu o prêmio Nobel de Medicina/Fisiologia, pela importância desta técnica para a humanidade. Este artigo revisa as etapas envolvidas na fertilização in vitro (FIV), as dificuldades dos pioneiros, as soluções encontradas e os procedimentos clínicos utilizados atualmente.
Louise Brown, the first baby conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF), was born in 1978. This landmark was a result of research conducted by biologist Robert Edwards and gynecologist Patrick Steptoe (1). In 2010, Edwards was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in recognition of the importance of IVF to humanity. The objective of the present article is to review the steps involved in IVF, the difficulties faced by pioneers, the solutions found, and the clinical procedures currently employed.